Why is Oil and Gas Camera Monitoring Needed?

Inspection technology has all the time had a vital role to play in the oil and gas trade, but that task is changing. Site security remains of vital importance and always will; yet, oil and gas camera monitoring technology has evolved, mutually in terms of quality and competence, so has industry way of thinking regarding its purpose. Full risk management is now an essential challenge.

oil and gas camera monitoring technology

In their pursuit of oil, gas and other usual commodities, plants globally are subject to checks under each country’s particular laws. A large-scale natural gas leak or other accidents might lead to a terrible result for those working in the plant, plus the loss of billions of dollars and immense ecological damage.

With the dawn of technology that allows oil and gas camera monitoring to an exceptional degree of accuracy, we are set to enter a new era in plant security.

Risk Management

Complete risk management involves three main strands:

  • Keeping physical resources secure;
  • Maintaining site safety and operational competence; and shielding personnel from harm.
  • Additionally, it involves the implementation of protocols for both hazard prevention and incident response (damage limitation).

For an industry where resources – frequently located in isolated areas – face threats ranging from severe physical conditions to political conflict, risk organization of this nature becomes extremely challenging.

Siloed management of different security, protection and operational systems leaves a lot of opportunities for mistakes and eventually creates unwanted and unnecessary inefficiency. As a result, the only way to possibly tackle a challenge of this capacity and scale is to take on a joined-up approach: uniting individual systems and enabling numerous levels of oil and gas camera monitoring from a single, open platform. This is where oil and gas camera monitoring can offer a real advantage.

Site Security

Threats of physical attack is a thought the oil and gas industry has been well-known with for a long time. The initial recorded attack on an offshore oil and gas benefit dates back to 1899. Though observation technology may not date back fairly this far, its role in preventing, detecting and responding to physical security breach is well acknowledged.

By cleverly integrating video with third-party access control, boundary alarm, motion detection and previous site security data inside a single monitoring and control situation, greater depth of breach detection is probable, for the most part over IP-networked solutions. Any irregularity, or combination of irregularity, can be planned to automatically trigger an ocular feed from applicable camera locations, enabling control room operators to examine further and instantly assess risk.

These benefits are heightened by the truth that IP-based, networked solutions allow advanced remote access and control, for instance, allowing offshore or secluded assets to be monitored and controlled from offsite command hubs. For operations with numerous region-wide or worldwide assets this is a major benefit, above all in a critical breach situation.

The Changing Role of Oil and Gas Camera Monitoring

cyber threats in oil and gas camera monitoring

But, not all security threats are substantial – there is a new threat.

Cyber Threats

In the US, 40% of all cyber-attacks on CNI assets in 2012 were next to the energy sector, and by 2018, study suggests that attacks of this nature will rate the global oil and gas business $1.87 billion.

Here too, present surveillance command and control systems have modified. Integration capabilities allow any fluctuations; adjustments or variations in set IT parameters to trigger real-time alerts to whichever onsite or offsite have power over room operators. These alerts can be set to by design display ocular feed where applicable. For instance, if access control settings specify a system hack, this could straight away create a live feed from all high-risk site access point cameras, enabling operators to notice if a cyber-breach is part of a wider substantial invasion threat.

A physical element might not always go with a cyber-attack – the purpose may relatively be to cause system disarray. At this time, integrations via a surveillance command-and-control policy still offer heightened reaction mechanisms, enabling operators to put away plant areas, re-route power systems and follow supervision protocols to border harm and risk.

Add to this the improved audit trail and reporting capabilities that included oil and gas camera monitoring solutions offer and it becomes obvious why the sector is more and more seeing surveillance as more than merely a visual security benefit.